Does COVID cause heart damage?
First it did, then it didn't, now the vax does...
I think it’s fair to say that the “Pandemic” related events of the last three years can only be explained (at a high level) as being the product of one of the following:
Good intentions combined with gross incompetence
Greed and corruption (with a dose of #1)
Pre-planed coordination by supranational forces (with a dose of #1 and #2)
I don’t think anyone reading this Substack thinks #1 is the whole story and I’d agree that there’s just too much evidence not explained by this position for it to be seriously entertained as such. So then between the two remaining possibilities, which one is it?
Well, recently I stumbled across a few data points that when assessed in aggregate seem to support the pre-planning notion of #3. Specifically I’m referring to the timeline of messaging around cardiac risks as the “Pandemic” evolved.
In October of 2020, before the mass mRNA “vaccination” campaign even began, the website “healthline” published an article titled “What We Know About COVID-19 and Long-Term Heart Damage”. Not what we think, or what we believe, but what we KNOW. The article referenced sources with findings like:
“Nearly a quarter of people hospitalized with COVID-19 develop myocardial injury or injury to the heart tissue.”
Source: PubMed Central (NIH database)
“78 percent of recovered patients had abnormalities in the heart and 60 percent had ongoing myocardial inflammation.”
These findings Made COVID look like a real heartbreaker didn’t they? Well, fast forward to today and we have a study out of Israel titled “The Incidence of Myocarditis and Pericarditis in Post COVID-19 Unvaccinated Patients—A Large Population-Based Study” which concludes the following (emphasis mine):
“Post COVID-19 infection was NOT associated with either myocarditis (aHR 1.08; 95% CI 0.45 to 2.56) or pericarditis (aHR 0.53; 95% CI 0.25 to 1.13). We did NOT observe an increased incidence of neither pericarditis nor myocarditis in adult patients recovering from COVID-19 infection.”
Now, to add even more intrigue to all of this we also have this study that concludes:
“We found that myocarditis was the most commonly reported adverse cardiac event associated with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, which presented as chest pain with a rise in cardiac biomarkers. Further large-scale observational studies are recommended.”
Further large-scale observational studies are recommended! I guess so, and maybe we should get on that quickly?
Summary
We have studies in 2020, before the mass mRNA “vaccination” campaign began, stating significant risk of cardiac injury from COVID-19. These are then followed two years later by studies indicating a significant potential risk of cardiac injury from the mRNA “vaccines” and concluding the exact opposite for COVID-19! Does anyone else see the unsettling irony of this and the serious questions that it raises?
Even a light level of research on the WEF reveals a dark plan being carried out.
Could the difference be something as simple as, the first source cited (pubmed) was only looking at hospitalized C19 patients, where as the Israeli study was looking at all unvaccinated people who had C19? Only a small percent of people who get C19 are/were hospitalized, and it would make sense that if you are hospitalized you are having a serious complication. Add in the fact that someone could have been admitted to the hospital for a primary concern of a heart issue, only to be tested on admittance to find an incidental case of C19 - the “admitted for” vs “admitted with” issue that skewed all of the hospitalization numbers. I’m not saying I don’t think there is anything to see here, I am just wondering if this could explain the discrepancy?