Govt. admits boosters = more hospitalizations
Granted it's a tacit admission, but an admission nonetheless...
Last month I shared a nugget of data from the Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit in Ontario, Canada. This data showed that since June of this year COVID-19 hospitalizations have been 34% higher on average for the vaxxed than the unvaxxed. I continued to monitor this data as one of my last remaining windows into what’s happening but last week the data just disappeared.
Finding myself thrust back into data darkness I renewed my efforts to find similar data elsewhere. The fact is I couldn’t find a single comparable data set with hospitalization rates by vax status standardized per 100,000 anywhere in Canada. I was feeling pretty frustrated until out of the blue, the Simcoe Muskoka data re-appeared! This time however, it appeared different.
So what changed? Well, whereas the prior reporting simply used the categories of vaxxed versus unvaxxed the new reporting redefines vaxxed as a “Complete Series” of 2 jabs and breaks out 3 or more jabs as a distinct third category called “Boosted.” What’s revealing about this change is the boosted hospitalization rates are significantly and consistently higher than either the new vaxxed category or unvaxxed. Here’s what it looks like:
As you can see, hospitalizations for people jabbed 3 or more times are more than double those for people jabbed 2 times or less. As a side note, those jabbed only once and those with a second jab less than 14 days old, continue to be lumped in with unvaxxed. As such, we still can’t get a clear picture of hospitalization rates for the truly unvaxxed.
Given the Simcoe Muskoka data is only one relatively small dataset (population of ~500,000) I searched for additional data showing 3 or more jabs versus the rest of the pack and captured the following snapshot from the Nova Scotia COVID-19 dashboard.
This Nova Scotia data shows that while 53.4% of the population has received 3+ jabs, 64% of hospitalizations are from this very same group. While admittedly this is not a standardized view like the Simcoe Muskoka data it does seem to also imply that 3 or more jabs leads to greater hospitalizations.
In summary, I struggle to see how this data could be interpreted as anything other than a condemnation of the efficacy of booster jabs in reducing hospitalizations from COVID-19. What does everyone else think? Am I missing something?
Very interesting data. However, I assume the people continuing to get boosters may have a disproportionate number of elderly? They seem to be the most afraid. Most of the younger people seemed to get the initial vaccines because they had to for work, school, travel etc. Could that be the case?
I can explain the counter-argument or the half you are missing since you politely requested it at the end of your article. First, let's use your 53.4% number who are 3+ boosted and your vaccination status figure of 81.9% have 2 doses or more. We can figure out how many have 2 doses pretty quickly via subtraction of all people 3 or more from those 2 or more giving us just those with 2 doses. Ready? 81.9 - 53.4 = 28.5% of the population are 2-dosed.
Okay? With me so far? 28.5% of the population had 2 doses. Easy easy calculation. Next, let's look at your data for how many hospitalizations exist for people 2 with 2 doses. How many hospitalizations are in this 28.5% group? According to your data 18%.
Sooooo 28.5% of the population is experiencing ONLY 18% of the hospitalizations. This group seems to be UNDER effected by covid compared to the unvaccinated/boosted groups.
Now, people who have taken 4 doses? They tend to be very-old and very-sick to begin with like 60-70+. Even before covid, the vast majority of healthcare resources have ALWAYS been used by the elderly. They use far more bed-days, care-hours, nursing-hours, icu-days, surgeries, etc.
Any metric you pick, we spend tons looking after people 60+ to 70+. A 24 year old basically pre-covid would only end up in the hospital in two scenarios. Extreme stupidity, ex. if he did something stupid mountain biking and broke an arm. Or replace mountain bike with skateboard or replace skateboard with 'tiktok challenge' or add the phrase 'while drunk/hold my beer'. These 'exceptional' individuals were the rarity. The other scenario is a developmentally disabled person, person with cancer, person with type 1 diabetes or some kind of pre-existing condition as a result of a bad-roll of luck in life. These are the exception to the rule and these people also tended to be triple/quad-vaccinated so they aren't even part of the 'unvaccinated' group or '2 dose' group. These healthy 18-25 year olds are the ones who probably took 2 doses for work/university and then stopped. So they should be under-reported based off health-alone and 70-80+ should be over represented based off health-alone who are likely to be the 4 dosers.
Age is the number one mortality factor. So really, you should be looking at the relationship between age and number of vaccines. Interestingly, unvaccinated people are often 40 or under and generally healthy, which leads to the "I don't need this shot" mentality because I'm "fit/young/healthy/have vitality/good immune system". Unvaccinated are 14.7% of the population and make up 15% of the hospitalizations. They are very slightly over-represented. Is this because of their youth/fitness/vitality/good immune systems? The two-dose-vaccination groups are under represented at 18% while making up 28.5% of population so they are doing far-better than the unvaccinated.
IF the vaccine is super-ineffective, why are double-vaccinated doing far-better than unvaccinated, when unvaccinated are generally younger, healthier and fitter with better immune systems? Everyone keeps saying vaccinated people's immune system are ruined but two-dose people are doing SUPERIOR?! HUH?! Is it more plausible, a quad-boosted person is hospitalized more often because they are 70+ and 70+ always get hit hard by flus/vaccinations/have used the vast bulk of hospital visits for decades or are people with a bunch of pre-existing conditions like cancer/type-1 diabetes, etc so covid hits them hard because of these pre-existing conditions? or because the vaccine is ineffective at 4 doses, yet very effective, at 2 doses?
It is a bit of a logically inconsistent pseudo-scientific conspiracy theory that relies you to ignore the effectiveness show in the two-dose group, and strictly compare young-healthy-unvaccinated people against 70-80+ quad-boosted people and say the boosters didn't work because young healthy people are healthier and ignoring the moderate-health people who took the shot, are under represented in hospitalizations and doing well.
But if you do what you did and just ignore the 2 doses people and ignore the age demographics behind unvaccinated versus four doses, then sure, its highly ineffective looking. If you look for confounding variables/explanatory variables not in your limited model, your model falls apart faster than a first-year students end-of-term-project made of cardboard, glue, tape and the previous 2 days sweat.