It's going to be a tool on hyperactive doing what it's masters want. So it will be the same as the paid shills, talking heads and the Social media bots already plaguing our society. I'm not surprised by your reporting. My theory is that it will always eventually use any trust it gains against you. For your Demise. Yes. Because the shots can kill. It knows. And so can suicide. So a non benevolent interesting toy to be very careful with.
All ChatGPT is doing is searching the internet and providing answers in a nicely formatted form. We should not expect its reliability to be any worse or better than generic internet searches.
Also, what about all the assertions about safety and efficacy added to the responses? I didn't ask about any of that. To me that shows a programmed bias implying that ChatGPT is being used as a propaganda tool.
Fair enough but don't you think it's strange that I directed it to the source info, it acknowledged it, and then subsequently claimed it didn't have that information?
ChatCPT has access to the same information that you have. I assume the bias you are seeing is the same bias that is shown when a web search on this topic is performed.
I am guessing that ChatGPT is aware there are two possible answers to your question and it is providing the most popular and most sited answer. It is beyond its capabilities to determine which answer is the "truth".
I would prefer if ChatGPT supplied both answers and said that it was beyond its capabilities to determine which answer was the "truth".
It's going to be a tool on hyperactive doing what it's masters want. So it will be the same as the paid shills, talking heads and the Social media bots already plaguing our society. I'm not surprised by your reporting. My theory is that it will always eventually use any trust it gains against you. For your Demise. Yes. Because the shots can kill. It knows. And so can suicide. So a non benevolent interesting toy to be very careful with.
All ChatGPT is doing is searching the internet and providing answers in a nicely formatted form. We should not expect its reliability to be any worse or better than generic internet searches.
Also, what about all the assertions about safety and efficacy added to the responses? I didn't ask about any of that. To me that shows a programmed bias implying that ChatGPT is being used as a propaganda tool.
Fair enough but don't you think it's strange that I directed it to the source info, it acknowledged it, and then subsequently claimed it didn't have that information?
ChatCPT has access to the same information that you have. I assume the bias you are seeing is the same bias that is shown when a web search on this topic is performed.
I am guessing that ChatGPT is aware there are two possible answers to your question and it is providing the most popular and most sited answer. It is beyond its capabilities to determine which answer is the "truth".
I would prefer if ChatGPT supplied both answers and said that it was beyond its capabilities to determine which answer was the "truth".
There is still the issue of the appended unsolicited endorsement of the COVID vaccine. How is that any different than inserting an advertisement?
If you just Google the question you will get:
From Dose 1 through the March 13, 2021 data cutoff date, there were a total of 38
deaths, 21 in the COMIRNATY group and 17 in the placebo group. None of the deaths
were considered related to vaccination.
Which should be the right answer with the same bias toward a perfect vaccine :)
Interesting, thanks Cees!
Whoah. We’re screwed.
It didn't admit its error. It just acknowledged your restrictions.
Also placebo is not placebo. It's another vaccination. Can't remember which one in this case, maybe a shitty version of the measles vaxx for *reasons*